Traveling Light

The worst tourists in the world

Mon Oct 9, 11:00 AM ET

I read with interest a recent study by the Trans-Global Association for Travel and Tourism Commerce, which rated the behavior of tourists from all the world's industrialized countries.  Consistently ranking last in the study — bottoming out in categories ranging from airline etiquette to podiatric hygiene — were travelers from Great Britain.  "This settles it," a TATTC spokesperson was quoted as saying.  "The British are the worst tourists in the world."

Actually, I'm just kidding.  There is no such thing as the Trans-Global Association for Travel and Tourism Commerce.  I made it up just now, because I know that people like to obsess over international rankings, and I've been looking for a chance to poke fun at the British. 

Mind you, I don't really think the British are bad tourists.  To the contrary, I've usually found travelers from the U.K. to be friendly, well read, and quite prolific in their wanderings.  You can find Brits in all corners of the world, from Valparaiso to Vladivostok, and they most always make good travel companions. 

The problem I have with the British is that — to a bigger extent than other travelers I've met — they seem to be obsessed with stereotypes of national character. 

I used to think that British travelers were just disproportionately gung-ho about bashing Americans (apparently, we're noisy, over-religious, and we're supposed to use a "u" when we spell "color").  Over time, however, I've discovered that many Brits also hold strong preconceptions about nearly every nationality in the travel milieu, from the Swiss (officious and dull), to the Japanese (unimaginative and over-polite), to the Argentines (narcissistic and sex-obsessed). 

In fact, were I to base my perceptions entirely on the basis of Britannic generalizations, I could very well conclude that the world's worst tourists are roughly categorized as follows:

  1. Americans:  Ignorant.  Loud.  Oblivious to surroundings.  Insincere.

  2. French:  Rude.  Bigoted.  A trifle out of touch with reality.

  3. Germans:  Humorless.  Rule-obsessed.  Unfriendly.  Stubborn.

  4. Israelis:  Rude.  Cheap.  Arrogant.  Cliquish.

  5. Canadians:  Exactly like Americans, but more soft-spoken, more polite, less ignorant, and twenty times more boring.

Before I go any further here, I will admit three things.  First, I realize the circular logic inherent in making generalizations about the generalizations of British travelers (and I apologize if you happen to be one of those Brits who isn't a nationalistic busybody).  Second, I realize that half the readers who've stumbled across my column this week have skipped straight from the headline to the above list, and are now typing angry things in the comments section below (especially if they happen to be American, French, German, Israeli, or Canadian).  And, third, I'll concede that the British fixation with national character reveals an impressive knack for world geography (in contrast to us Americans, who associate "Vienna" less with a European city than with canned snack sausages). 

Were I a more meticulous analyst, I might posit that this British tendency is the cultural residue of Victorian-era self-superiority (vivid examples of which can be found in most any 19th century British travel guidebook, one of which described Valencian Spaniards as "perfidious, vindictive, sullen, mistrustful, fickle, treacherous, smooth, empty of all good, snarling and biting like hyenas, and smiling as they murder.")  Since I'm no scholar, however, I'll just point out that the British affinity for stereotyping their fellow wanderers is a mostly harmless amplification of what all travelers do from time to time. 

The problem here is that assessing your travel companions by nationality is rarely an earnest inquiry so much as it is a dull parlor game — an empty exercise in rhetorical one-upmanship.  The worst travelers in the world are, after all, the rude, small-minded ones — and rude, small-minded travelers can hail from any nation.

Moreover, most hostel-lounge arguments about which countries export good or bad travelers fail to take in the local perspective.  A few years ago, a survey conducted by international tourist offices found that the oft-disparaged Germans and Americans were rated most favorably by host communities around the world.  This rating didn't hinge on cultural or aesthetic opinions, but the simple fact that Germans and Americans spend money more generously than their tourist counterparts.  Economic benefit, it would appear, was more important to local hosts than the common traveler obsessions with fashion, geopolitics, and collective behaviors in tacky backpacker nightclubs.

My point, then, is a simple one:  The next time you find yourself in a heated argument over which nation produces the best or worst tourists, this is probably an indicator that you've been spending too much time yapping in hostel lounges and not enough time outside having engaged adventures. 

And that, in its own way, means you're a bad tourist.

----------

Tip sheet

"How to avoid being an ugly American (or wherever it is you're from)"

1) Study up on the local culture.

Get to know something about a place before you go there.  Read novels and travel books about the region, and study guidebooks to learn about customs, manners, and cultural norms.  Learn a few phrases of the language (such as greetings, thank yous, numbers, and food terms).  Keep in mind that culture expresses itself at an instinctive level — not an intellectual level — and that different standards of time, courtesy, and personal service may apply in far-off lands.

2) Listen, and ask questions.

On the road, make it a habit to talk less and listen more.  Travel is hardly the time to extol the virtues (or shortcomings) your home country; instead be curious about how people think in the place you're visiting.  Ask follow-up questions.  Seek to maintain open-mindedness, which is a process of listening and considering — of muting your compulsion to judge what is right and wrong, good and bad, proper and improper, and having the tolerance and patience to try and see things for what they are.

3) Avoid arguing politics.

Avoid political proselytizing, regardless of which end of the political spectrum you think you represent.  At home, political convictions are a tool for getting things done within your community; on the road, political convictions are a clumsy set of experiential blinders, compelling you to seek evidence for conclusions you've already drawn.  If you really are liberal and enlightened (or conservative and informed) you will stop yammering about politics and learn something about the culture you're visiting. 

4) Avoid traveling in large groups.

If your sorority or church group or wiccan pilates club decides to travel to Paris or Quito or Bangkok as an eight-some, do everyone a favor and split into groups of two.  This will make you less noisy, less self-enclosed, more approachable, and more open to what's going on around you.  If nobody wants to split off from the group with you, tackle the day solo.  I guarantee that you will have more memorable adventures on your own than with a big group of travelers.

5) Give respect and you get respect.

Having rigid stereotypes about individuals you haven't taken the time to know is silly in all contexts.  As a representative of your own country, the best way to win respect is to show respect to everyone you meet.  Odds are, your hosts will return the favor.

RECOMMEND THIS STORY

Recommend It:

Average (Not Rated)

0.0 stars

Comments

Join the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

I so agree with the "talk less, listen more" admonishment ... but also, don't talk in a condescending tone. I was in Russia once with a small group, and we had a lady with us who used to talk to our tour guide as though the tour guide was a three-year old. All the time she'd start up with things like, "in our country, when it rains, we cover ourselves with an umbrella ... what do you use in your country?" and "In our country, our homes are heated by furnaces ... what are your homes heated by?" I would point out to her that we weren't in a rural third world area, we were in Moscow, and people could plainly be seen using umbrellas, and buildings we walked in were clearly using steam radiators for heat, but she'd shush me and say, "it's important to share these things with the locals, so we get to know their country, but they get to know our country as well." I felt like going to our tour guide, "in our country, we have annoying people who don't read up on the countries they're visiting, and ask really dumb questions ... in your country, do you have these people, too??" But decorum won out.
Posted by dawsoncj on Mon, Oct 9, 2006 11:28 AM ET
It's quite a shame President Bush didn't read up on these simple rules before visiting Iraq, Iran, Israel, Jordan, China, Japan, Koreea, Mexico, Canada, England, Germany, etc, etc. Simple rules ignored by a buffoon. Typical American.
Posted by vudukungfu on Mon, Oct 9, 2006 2:26 PM ET
#2: Shut it.
Posted by mutiny1 on Mon, Oct 9, 2006 2:38 PM ET
As an American who has lived in London and traveled all over the globe, yes we are a bit brash at times. The only rule that should be followed is never talk down to a local. That should always be followed regardless of you location of course.
Posted by markkhristofmcshane on Mon, Oct 9, 2006 2:44 PM ET
About rule #3... I recently traveled to England, where anti-American sentiment seems to be at an extreme. Well aware of this (as my boyfriend is British), I did everything to steer clear of politics when talking to his friends. I was NOT prepared, however, for the unprovoked harassment about President Bush, the Iraq war, how Americans are addicted to petroleum, and are stupid and fat. What frustrated me the most was that I couldn't seem to get a word in edgewise to make the points that: A) I also do not like our President and did not vote for him; B) I fully oppose the war, too, and know many people who have participated in protests; C) We sit in our car during a 30-min work commute because there is NO OTHER WAY to get from here to there, and would gladly take alternative transport if it indeed EXISTED in our semi-rural area. What struck me about the Brits is that they are raised to think they are the most polite, intelligent people in the world. Yet, even when I tried to communicate that I had the same sentiments about politics, some of the people absolutely refused to listen to me, and seemed completely unwilling to grasp what reality is like here, in America. What a disappointment it was. I thought that Europeans were the enlightened ones. The next time I'm looking for some British tea and sympathy, I'll fix my own cuppa, thanks.
Posted by tutuwaltz on Mon, Oct 9, 2006 2:49 PM ET
I can't tell if the above comment is intentionally ironic.
Posted by emilphillips on Mon, Oct 9, 2006 2:53 PM ET
My favorite part on the list of avoiding being an "ugly American": Having rigid stereotypes about individuals you haven't taken the time to know is silly in all contexts.
Posted by ageejas1 on Mon, Oct 9, 2006 2:54 PM ET
I lived in Paris for a while and agree with the article for the most part. And i would avoid those obnoxious American tourists as much as anyone. What I found is that every country has some annoying tourists. Most Americans did try and did follow the rules in this article. As did most Germans, italians, etc. But there were just as many obnoxious Italians as there were Americans. Unfortunately, Americans are painted with the stroke of our government and so when of those obnoxious Americans is around, people seem to remember that one more than any of the other nationalities. But this is only from my own experiences and maybe other people have others. As far as arguing politics, i always found it enjoyable if the other people were willing to listen and be civil about it. Often you do find holier-than-thou Europeans who won't listen, and in that case there is nothing you can do. The best thing is to just walk away. There are just ignorant as many of the Americans who have never been out of the US.
Posted by jkotecki on Mon, Oct 9, 2006 3:09 PM ET
I lived in Paris for a while and agree with the article for the most part. And i would avoid those obnoxious American tourists as much as anyone. What I found is that every country has some annoying tourists. Most Americans did try and did follow the rules in this article. As did most Germans, italians, etc. But there were just as many obnoxious Italians as there were Americans. Unfortunately, Americans are painted with the stroke of our government and so when of those obnoxious Americans is around, people seem to remember that one more than any of the other nationalities. But this is only from my own experiences and maybe other people have others. As far as arguing politics, i always found it enjoyable if the other people were willing to listen and be civil about it. Often you do find holier-than-thou Europeans who won't listen, and in that case there is nothing you can do. The best thing is to just walk away. There are just ignorant as many of the Americans who have never been out of the US.
Posted by jkotecki on Mon, Oct 9, 2006 3:09 PM ET
As long ago as 2002, before the Iraq conflict began, I was harrassed in Buenos Aires for being an American, the assumption being that because I lived there, I must support Bush. No one wanted to listen to the fact that I didn't vote for Bush and I thought him as big an idiot as most of the world does. It was clear that the fellow who'd approached me was seeking evidence to support the conclusion he had already arrived at, like someone said above. Ignorance and preconceived notions aren't unique to any one nation. If everyone traveled, maybe that wouldn't be so. But I suppose it's not travel that's the key, it's the willingness to open one's mind and not rely on snap judgments or incomplete information.
Posted by jenallen74 on Mon, Oct 9, 2006 3:34 PM ET